After some significant falls at the end of last year markets have now recovered and so far this calendar year the bulls are stampeding. The Australian market is up 15% and the US market is up 13% on the back of, amongst other things, the US central bank changing policy from increasing interest rates to reducing rates. There are certainly some big cattle running in the markets.

Nothing has really changed over the last two or three years. Markets continue to be relatively expensive and benign while risks remain elevated. The rocketing Australian tech stocks the WAAAX stocks (Wisetech, Afterpay, Altium, Appen and Xero) are now trading at stratospheric valuations. Investors in defensive investments and taking a risk-averse approach continue to be punished from both an income point of view and from a comparative returns point of view. Term deposit rates have now fallen again to the 2.6% to 2.7% level. Income of approximately 5% is available from growth investments so its little wonder that markets have for the time being increased again.

As always it’s impossible to know when things will change again although I note that Peter Gutwein delivered the Tasmanian budget yesterday and the US market fell by over 1% last night. Hmmm.

The banks have continued to make many headlines in recent months and have been the subject of their own inquisition in the form of the Royal Commission. So how do the banks now look?

The below article (Westpac of interest as sector fundamentals start to turn) by David Walker from ClimeDirect gives a good summary of the benefits and risks of the banks at this time. This article was published by ClimeDirect and is included here with the kind permission of ClimeDirect. For more information on or a free trial of ClimeDirect go to

Part 1 of Banks and the Spanish Inquisition can be read here.

This blog does not make any recommendations. For sound long term financial, superannuation (including self-managed superannuation funds) and investment advice please contact me at





Westpac of interest as sector fundamentals start to turn

David Walker, Senior Equities Analyst ClimeDirect 22 May 2019

The four-year bank earnings downgrade cycle rumbled on after Westpac’s interim result, with downgrades of up to seven per cent to the bank’s fiscal 2019 and 2020 earnings per share by broking analysts even though expectations were already low before the result. Readers could be forgiven for thinking there is no end in sight to the pain, as the same negatives continue to weigh on earnings and returns. Analysts are focused on weaker housing and SME loan growth, interest margin pressure from price competition in mortgages and switching from higher-margin interest-only loans to lower-margin principal & interest loans, falling fee income, billion-dollar customer remediation costs, elevated legal, regulatory and compliance costs, rising retail borrower arrears and pockets of negative equity, loss of earnings from business divestments, potential adverse changes to negative gearing policies and reduced prospects for buybacks and special dividends due to regulatory uncertainty about capital. Reserve Bank rate cuts, which seem increasingly likely after the central bank shifted to a more cautious view of the economy in its recent Statement on Monetary Policy, would reduce deposit margins.

This is indeed a long list of negatives and it’s not over yet, with bank second half results set to look similar. But value investors with the temperament to tolerate further bad news and consequent share price volatility should prepare to be “greedy when others are fearful”, to quote Buffett. There could be moments during Westpac’s 2019 second half and 2020 first half when pessimism about earnings and returns creates opportunities to build out positions in a stock with a fully franked six per cent dividend yield and moderate earnings upgrade potential from 2021. Following this strategy will require looking ahead by around nine months, as this is beyond the market’s perennial focus on the next earnings result up to six months out.

The positive thesis for Westpac centres on things getting less bad over 2019-20 and the earnings downgrade cycle ending. We think house prices will bottom when buyers see value in housing again and population growth driven by immigration absorbs pockets of oversupply. New housing supply is tapering, evidenced by weakness in building approvals, so the ratio of demand to supply should evolve more favourably or less negatively, supporting a diminishing rate of house price depreciation in coming periods. In NSW, the ratio of housing demand to supply has already risen from 19-year lows.

Stimulus in the form of tax cuts, once enacted, may be back-dated to 1 July and should increase borrowers’ ability to service and receive approval for mortgages. Ongoing increases in funding for education, healthcare, aged care and disability support should drive further employment growth in these sectors, admittedly temporarily offset by lower employment in dwelling construction.

The domestic yield curve is inverted, signalling the policy cash rate is too high. RBA rate cuts would help to stabilise the housing market and banks would likely use them as an opportunity to reprice mortgages, particularly as this will be after the election. Mortgage repricing was an important support to interest margins in Westpac’s first half. RBA rate cuts would also restore a positive slope to the Australian yield curve, a situation associated with positive performance by bank shares – and also undervalued shares in general.

The RBA recently cut its 2019-20 GDP growth forecast from 3.00 per cent to 2.75 per cent and forecast inflation would take longer to return to its target range. Growth was 2.3 per cent over the year to the December quarter. Even if there is another downgrade to 2.50%, banks still face a benign mix of no imminent hard landing and policy stimulus. Meanwhile, the buoyant trade surplus increases private saving of foreign currency and Australian dollar depreciation supports domestic firms in the tradables sector.

Westpac has significantly derisked by reducing the proportion of interest-only loans to 31 per cent of its mortgage book. While this is still well above peers, the ratio is down from a peak of 50 per cent two years ago.

We have noticed a trend towards more short-termism in some analyst research on banks and not enough credit for the generally solid execution of core strategies by major bank management teams. Once remediation costs have peaked, banks will cycle depressed earnings, organic capital growth should start to overtake remediation costs, and this should support sentiment on the sector. In Westpac’s case this will come some time in fiscal 2020, when the bank will provide for its costs in remediating customers of its aligned advisers. Provisions for remediating customers of salaried advisers are being taken in fiscal 2019. Meanwhile Westpac continues to reduce its underlying operating costs to offset the lack of revenue growth but is still investing in its strong customer franchise. Guidance is for a one per cent reduction on the 2018 cost base.

The regulator APRA’s move this week to reduce the minimum interest rate for mortgage servicing assessment from 7 per cent to the bank’s lending rate plus a 2.5 per cent buffer increases maximum borrowing capacity by around 9 per cent but up to 14 per cent after RBA rate cuts. The bipartisan first home owner’s deposit insurance scheme proposed in the election campaign signalled the political system’s appetite to relax collateral requirements for this cohort. Both measures should stimulate home lending and support bank interest revenue.

After National Australia Bank recently cut its dividend, attention has turned to Westpac as the next bank which could also cut. Given the bank’s adequate capital position, at this stage we think discounted and/or underwritten dividend reinvestment plans are more likely given Westpac’s appetite to distribute its flow of franking credits. Share issuance from the currently discounted DRP is pressuring EPS growth but in our view, it would take a material surge in bad debts expense for capital to come under sufficient pressure for a dividend cut to be necessary to protect the balance sheet.


Clime Group owns shares in WBC.


Disclaimer: StocksInValue and associated websites are published by Stocks In Value Pty Ltd ACN 162 644 724 (Trading as Clime Direct), Authorised Representative of Clime Asset Management Pty Limited ACN 098 420 770 AFS Licence 221146. The information provided in this document is intended for general use only. The information presented does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation and advisory needs of any particular person nor does the information provided constitute investment advice. Because of this, you should, before acting on any information on this website, consider whether it is appropriate to your objectives, financial situation and needs. Clime Direct does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information in this website, including information provided by third parties. We will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts, opinions and ideas contained within this website.

Except for personal non-commercial use, you may not copy, publish, distribute or reproduce any of the information contained in this newsletter in any form without the prior written consent of SIV. If you have any queries please email Clime Direct at Our full terms & conditions are available on our public website (


Members, please note: investing in direct equity exposes you to the risk of capital loss. Before investing in any of these companies, we recommend you convince yourself, through your own research, that you agree with our theses or have an alternative positive thesis. It is also imperative that your portfolio weighting for any stock is consistent with your risk tolerance. Finally, we recommend you take a three to five-year view on all equity investments. These are not empty ‘caveats’, but the exact principles that our own fund manager partner makes, when investing on behalf of their clients – you should do similarly. Safe investing!

This note summarises the insights and understanding of Clime Direct at the time of publishing. Importantly, the understanding of our analysts will evolve in response to ongoing changes in company operating and financial performance, equity market conditions, internal research and discussions with management. As time passes after publication, reports become a less accurate reflection of the current thinking of Clime analysts. While analysts endeavour to publish frequently about stocks of interest to members, they are not able to comment on all company, market and internal research developments. For this reason members considering an investment based on our thesis are advised to always ensure they understand and still agree with that thesis, and are aware of the downside risks to their investment.